di: Charles Arthur also responds to the Most Comprehensive Meta-Analysis article.

[Joe Kuhn]

Charles, along your lines, I'm wondering if there's research that shows
sounding it out, out-loud, is more effective than sounding it out 'in your
head'.  Of course we know the answer to the question, but is there research
on this?

BTW, love the detail on your web site.  Wow!

Joe

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Charles Arthur <carthur at teleport.com>
wrote:

> I’m also very anxious to see the full article on the meta-analysis of DI
> curricula.  and PRESTO.  here it is.  Thanks Jerry
>
> I’m particularly interested seeing if it touches on a vital concern of
> mine in teaching phonemic awareness and decoding in Reading Mastery K.  As
> most readers on this listserve know, teaching these two kinds of skills
> hinges on one technique:  Say the sound without stopping, with and without
> letters.  I’ve just posted a short review on this on my website:
> arthurreadingworkshop.com. (on the Seminar page) It’s entitled, WHERE
> RESEARCH HAS FAILED IN THE STUDY OF TEACHING BEGINNING PHONEMIC AWARENESS
> AND DECODING.   http://arthurreadingworkshop.com/seminar/
>
> The vast amount of research on this topic has affirmed the importance of
> phonemic awareness in teaching beginning reading, something Zig anticipated
> before the wave of research studies started.  The failure has been in
> researching how phonemic awareness, followed up with decoding, can be most
> effectively and efficiently taught, with Zig’s technique of Say the sounds
> without Stopping.  I can only find two published research studies on this.
> (Weisberg 1989, 1993, copies available on request)
>
> All the rest of the studies on this topic support saying the sounds and
> decoding *with pauses*.  One could almost claim that the DI,  RM K method
> is not research based.    In all of this Meta-Analysis, why has research on
> this vital piece of teaching beginning reading been omitted?  Or has Jean
> and Tim found some other studies? Under these circumstances, how can it be
> considered research based?
>
> Please read what I’ve posted, and let me know what you think.
> Charles Arthur
> Early Child Literacy Consultant
> carthur at teleport.com
> The most effective reading programs  carefully structure instruction
> around mastery of small learning increments that leads to
> student proficiency of advanced applications and higher student self-esteem.
> 971-544-7341 <(971)%20544-7341>
>
>
> <https://www.facebook.com/Arthur-Reading-Workshop-311701916000900/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/Arthur-Reading-Workshop-311701916000900/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> di mailing list
> di at lists.uoregon.edu
> https://lists-prod.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/di
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists-prod.uoregon.edu/pipermail/di/attachments/20180120/b1b2e69b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Yootheme-Social-Bookmark-Social-facebook-box-blue-4 (dragged).tiff
Type: image/tiff
Size: 24102 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists-prod.uoregon.edu/pipermail/di/attachments/20180120/b1b2e69b/attachment-0001.tiff>