di: best readings/rubrics for how DI defines excellent teaching?

[Sean Geraghty]

Let's assume someone's read most of Zig, Student-Program Alignment and
Teaching to Mastery
<https://www.nifdi.org/docman/suggested-reading/white-papers-by-zig/900-student-program-alignment-and-teaching-to-mastery-by-siegfried-engelmann/file.html>,
Components of DI
<https://www.nifdi.org/research/journal-of-di/volume-3-no-2-summer-2003/449-the-components-of-direct-instruction/file>,
DI rubric <https://www.zigsite.com/PDFs/rubric.pdf>.

What I can't find in there is - where is the rubric on excellent teaching?
There are numerous references to "Master DI teachers," for example. And
there are many, many references to different types of correction
procedures.

But ... what do these Master teachers do, very specifically? Are they just
really good at correction procedures? Where is the inventory of skills for
superior teachers located, what does that continuum look like, what does
that rubric look like?

HELP.

And thanks!



-- 

*Sean Geraghty*
Chief Academic and Schools Officer
+14018645809
Skype: sgbridge1
[image: Bridge International Academies]
<http://www.bridgeinternationalacademies.com>
Website <http://www.bridgeinternationalacademies.com> | Facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/bridgeinternationalacademies> | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/BridgeIntlAcads> | YouTube
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzv6cLdGD9TdxH2ieU4lvyg> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/bridge-international-academies/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.uoregon.edu/pipermail/di/attachments/20200819/881f1516/attachment.html>