di: di Digest, Vol 75, Issue 6

Aimee Taylor littlegreen at ymail.com
Wed Aug 8 09:41:01 PDT 2018


This was my thought when I responded to the op but my reply never came through to the list. A “verbal” (or sign language but preferably cued speech English or nu vue cue) output that corresponds to the phonemes of the language (and eventually graphemes) would be essential to reading. I suggested low performers manual or a verbal behavior approach similar to VB-MAPP like Essential for Living by McGreevy https://www.essentialforliving.com/

Best wishes, Aimee Taylor, parent

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 6, 2018, at 7:27 PM, Christopher Duss <duss.christopher at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Elissa and DI List,
> 
> In case it was missed, one replier pointed out the Lower Performers' Manual published on zigsite.com. In that manual, after the assessment on page 72, Zig outlines a detailed program for children who are not only non-verbal but also unresponsive to basic action commands, that aims to take them up to the level required to begin Language for Learning. The implementation appears challenging but effective. 
> 
> On the original question of teaching reading, my understanding from a DI perspective is that reading isn't typically introduced until a basic level of verbal output is achieved - specifically mastery in the first 40 lessons of Language for Learning. I am unaware of adaptations Zig or other DI designers would make for people with learning difficulties. Would the approach still be to continue working toward that before introducing reading, regardless of how long it takes? 
> 
> Best regards,
> Chris
> 
>> On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 4:00 AM, <di-request at lists.uoregon.edu> wrote:
>> Send di mailing list submissions to
>>         di at lists.uoregon.edu
>> 
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>         https://lists-prod.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/di
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>         di-request at lists.uoregon.edu
>> 
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>         di-owner at lists.uoregon.edu
>> 
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of di digest..."
>> 
>> 
>> Today's Topics:
>> 
>>    1. Re:  DI with non, or minimally verbal students (Shanon Sittler)
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 17:23:47 +0000
>> From: Shanon Sittler <ssittler at tulpehocken.org>
>> To: Beth Lang <elizabethlang.bcba at gmail.com>
>> Cc: "DI at lists.uoregon.edu" <DI at lists.uoregon.edu>
>> Subject: Re: di: DI with non, or minimally verbal students
>> Message-ID: <6F14753D-CDEB-42D5-AFC5-FAEC399CC0BD at tulpehocken.org>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>> 
>> I agree with this thought entirely!  The proper output system is a critical piece that also needs to be addressed. ELSB has AT built in as an option and can absolutely be used alongside SRA to give the kiddos access to all of the instruction they are entitled to.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Aug 2, 2018, at 1:02 PM, Beth Lang <elizabethlang.bcba at gmail.com<mailto:elizabethlang.bcba at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Just a thought- non vocal correlates but does not mean low vocabulary. With the right output system... you could find yoursef denying a kid access to needed instruction.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Beth
>> 
>> On Wednesday, August 1, 2018, Shanon Sittler <ssittler at tulpehocken.org<mailto:ssittler at tulpehocken.org>> wrote:
>> I feel that language for learning requires a lot of language for a non-vocal child to meaningfully participate in instruction. I do believe that it would be very difficult to determine if a skill is mastered.  Has anyone used/considered Early Literacy Skills Builder (ELSB) published by Attainment?  I absolutely love SRA DI, but ELSB captures those low incidence and non-vocal kids in a way that Language for Learning can not.  It is definitely a program worthy of looking into.
>> 
>> As an aside, it is so encouraging to hear an administrator saying, ?We can do better!?  Thank you for the thought you are putting into this!
>> 
>> Best Wishes,
>> Shanon Sittler
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Aug 1, 2018, at 2:12 PM, Cathy Burner <cathyb1 at aol.com<mailto:cathyb1 at aol.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Elissa,
>> 
>> The Language for Learning CD is a sleeper.  I find this very appropriate for the population of students you have described.
>> 
>> All the best for a great school year,
>> 
>> Cathy Burner
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Elissa McKenzie <elissa at stlillian.org<mailto:elissa at stlillian.org>>
>> To: DI <DI at lists.uoregon.edu<mailto:DI at lists.uoregon.edu>>
>> Sent: Mon, Jul 30, 2018 12:37 pm
>> Subject: di: DI with non, or minimally verbal students
>> 
>> I am an administrator for a small school for children who have communication and learning challenges.
>> 
>> Our students have diagnoses that include ASD, Down Syndrome, Apraxia of Speech, Cerebral Palsy, and more...
>> 
>> We have been using Reading Mastery with fair success but feel we can do better.  In our school, we have the support of Speech Language Pathologists, ABA providers, OT's and PT's.  We use communication devices as well as picture boards for communication.  Still, we do find it difficult to assess the progress for students who are non-verbal or minimally verbal.
>> 
>> We are very creative with students support, but feel our students are limited by mastery being dependent on the verbal performance. Is there a systematic way to assess receptively as well as expressively?
>> 
>> Or, is there a DI program for non or minimally verbal students.
>> 
>> Any support or shared experience is appreciated.
>> 
>> Thank you
>> _______________________________________________
>> di mailing list
>> di at lists.uoregon.edu<mailto:di at lists.uoregon.edu>
>> https://lists-prod.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/di
>> _______________________________________________
>> di mailing list
>> di at lists.uoregon.edu<mailto:di at lists.uoregon.edu>
>> https://lists-prod.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/di
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Beth Lang
>> 
>> Director/Founder
>> 
>> Smart Sp:)t Educational Services LLC
>> 
>> 484-935-1111
>> 
>> www.smartspotlearning.com<http://www.smartspotlearning.com/>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 202 S. Third St. (Rt. 309)
>> 
>> Suite 2
>> 
>> Coopersburg, PA 18036
>> 
>> email: elizabethlang.bcba at gmail.com<mailto:elizabethlang.bcba at gmail.com>
>> 
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <http://lists-prod.uoregon.edu/pipermail/di/attachments/20180802/ed8f8137/attachment-0001.html>
>> 
>> End of di Digest, Vol 75, Issue 6
>> *********************************
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Chris Duss
> youtube.com/PicLily
> _______________________________________________
> di mailing list
> di at lists.uoregon.edu
> https://lists-prod.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/di
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists-prod.uoregon.edu/pipermail/di/attachments/20180808/de84d8d6/attachment.html>


More information about the di mailing list