cpsylist: FW: Petition Opposing APA's PTSD Guidelines - Clarifications

Ellen McWhirter ellenmcw at uoregon.edu
Wed Feb 14 09:31:58 PST 2018 

Dear Student Colleagues,

Please review the information below regarding the opposition to APA's new PTSD Guidelines.
Key elements to attend to include (a) how opposition to the guidelines has been misperceived and (b) how the question of "what constitutes evidence of effective treatment" (think Wampold, think Duncan & Reese) continues to play out in ways that have significant implications for treatment options.
If you have ever doubted the critical importance of scientist-practitioner training (and I know you haven't!) the info below will quell forever any such doubts!

Ellen

*******************************************
Ellen Hawley McWhirter, Ph.D.
Ann Swindells Professor of Counseling Psychology
Director, Spanish Language Psych. Services & Research Specialization
Counseling Psychology Program
5251 University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403-5251
(541) 346-2443 (office)
(541) 346-6778 (fax)
https://education.uoregon.edu/users/emcwhirter

I support all students regardless of immigration status or country of origin. As a member of the UO Dreamers Working Group, I support Dreamer students and promote their sense of belonging and safety as they pursue their higher education goals. For more information and resources please visit our Dreamers page (https://blogs.uoregon.edu/dreamers/) and the Immigration FAQs page (http://international.uoregon.edu/immigration_faq ). Remember, when interacting with faculty, staff, and offices around campus you are never required to reveal your status.

From: Division 17 Discussion list [mailto:DIV17DISCUSS at LISTS.APA.ORG] On Behalf Of Friedlander, Myrna L
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 11:32 AM
To: DIV17DISCUSS at LISTS.APA.ORG
Subject: [DIV17DISCUSS] FW: Petition Opposing APA's PTSD Guidelines - Clarifications



From: Division 43 Members list [mailto:DIV43 at LISTS.APA.ORG] On Behalf Of Madelyn Milchman
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 1:28 PM
To: DIV43 at LISTS.APA.ORG<mailto:DIV43 at LISTS.APA.ORG>
Subject: [DIV43] Petition Opposing APA's PTSD Guidelines - Clarifications

Dear Colleagues:
As opposition to APA's PTSD Guidelines grows - 2479 signatories to the Petition so far (see: https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/480/492/776/?cid=headerClick)  -  it has become apparent that some misperceptions have occurred and also that some of the reasons for opposing the Guidelines could benefit from further explanation.  This email is intended to address those issues.
Misperception of the Objections to the Use of RCTs as the Basis for the PTSD Guidelines

The petition is not an attack on research nor on RCT as a form of research.  The petition clearly asserts that our objection is to the use of RCTs as the only basis for making "best treatment" decisions. Nevertheless, several commentators on various listserves have responded as if we were disputing that RCTs have value and a role to play in evaluating treatment outcomes.  Therefore the reasons for our position needs elaboration to be clear.

Treatment-Related Reasons to Object to the APA PTSD Guidelines

  1.  Limiting treatment to only those methods that are supported by RCTs is not the consensus in the field. The limitation risks provision of treatment by therapists from all orientations who do not adhere exclusively to the Guideline.
  2.  The exclusive endorsement of RCT-supported treatments deprives patients of care from which they are benefiting.
  3.  The threat of deprivation of care is not to be taken lightly. Illinois BC/BS has already adopted these PTSD guidelines as a standard of medical necessity. The  , Guidelines give them a tool to refuse reimbursement for treatment
  4.  APA was aware of this risk and intended to address it by accompanying the treatment guideline with a professional practice guideline.  This assumes that users of the guideline will read both documents carefully and thoughtfully and will act based on such a thoughtful and honest analysis.  This is not a realistic assumption in the world of treatment. A recent CNN report indicated that a past Aetna Medical Director , "admitted under oath he never looked [emphasis added] at patients' records when deciding whether to approve or deny care" (para.1) https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/11/health/aetna-california-investigation/index.html.

Forensic-Related Reasons to Object to the APA PTSD Guidelines

  1.  This is also not a realistic assumption in forensic contexts.
  2.  We are very concerned that if you are using any other treatment than those included in APA's PTSD Guidelines and someone wants to file an ethical charge, a licensing board complaint, and/or sue you for malpractice, they have a strong weapon in stating that APA's PTSD Guideline only endorses a type of practice you were not using. Attorneys, disgruntled litigants, insurance companies, angry patients and others could easily assert that the Guidelines are the authoritative source, especially for psychologists, justifying their misuse despite APA's disclaimers to support adverse administrative, legal, and ethical actions against responsible clinicians.

Scientifically-Related Reasons to Object to the APA PTSD Guidelines

  1.  Some commentators asserted the use of RCT's as the scientific "gold standard."
  2.  There is no dispute that RCTs have scientific merit.  They are a derivative of the experimental method, which depends on the isolation of variables.  The isolation of variables allows scientific experiments to infer causality.  That is their strength.
  3.  However, the limitations of experiments, and their derivative, RCTs, must also be recognized. Several people have commented on issues related to the limitations of RCTs in general and of APA's RCT selection criteria specifically on various listserves and other forums.  It is beyond the scope of this email to recapitulate all those well-reasoned analyses.  The few discussed here have not been discussed with these specifics elsewhere.
     *   PTSD is a disorder that can rarely be isolated from other disorders.  Co-morbidities are the rule, ranging from  60% to 100% (Friel, White, & Hull, 2008; Young & Drogin, 2014; Galatzer-Levy, Nickerson, Litz, & Marmar, 2013).  In battered women, PTSD alone is rare (Follingstad, 2003).
     *    Gerald Young, Editor-in-Chief of the journal Psychological Injury and Law, writing on the misuse of PTSD diagnoses in civil tort cases, computed that including co-morbid symptoms creates 1.39 quintillion ways to have PTSD with common comorbidities (Young, Lareau, & Pierre, 2014).
     *   The RCTs that were the basis for the Guidelines deliberated excluded co-morbid disorders.  This is appropriate if the method is to be based on the strengths of the experimental method and achieve its goal of making causal statements (i.e., "this treatment causes these symptoms to be reduced").
     *   However, it is the weakness if the goal is to achieve ecological validity for the results, b/c, simply put, trauma victims do not usually suffer from PTSD symptoms alone.
  4.  The problems caused by the isolation of variables is not limited to co-morbidity.  It also occurs when disorders are removed from their social, racial/ethnic, cultural, economic, political, and other contexts.  Decontextualization also limits ecological validity.
  5.  APA's Multicultural Guidelines emphasize this strongly.  Therefore, APA's promulgation of both the Multicultural and the PTSD Guidelines lacks theoretical consistency and conflicts with the scientific principle of parsimony.

These reasons indicate that the APA PTSD Guidelines overgeneralize the basis for their treatment recommendations.  If they were promulgated as guidelines for the treatment of PTSD in patients with no co-morbidities, they would be tied more closely to their research evidence.  If they were promulgated as guidelines for patients whose social/etc. contexts were not seriously confounding their symptoms and recovery, they would be tied more closely to their research evidence.  As it is, there are no such limitations on their applicability and the only proposal in the pipeline (a separate document) may be scientifically responsible but is simply too easy to ignore for those who are motivated to do so.

For those of you patient enough to read this, I thank you and hope it clarifies some of the issues.  Please forward this to any divisions or other groups that you think might be interested.
Madelyn Simring Milchman, Ph.D.
Upper Montclair, NJ
(973) 783-6235
madelyn at milchman.com<mailto:madelyn at milchman.com>

__._,_.___
________________________________
Posted by: Madelyn Milchman <madelyn at milchman.com<mailto:madelyn at milchman.com>>
________________________________
Reply via web post<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/nj6/conversations/messages/721;_ylc=X3oDMTJwbGtzYWs3BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzkyNDUyMjEzBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA4MjY0MQRtc2dJZAM3MjEEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbGsDcnBseQRzdGltZQMxNTE4NTM0OTc3?act=reply&messageNum=721>

*

Reply to sender <mailto:madelyn at milchman.com?subject=Re%3A%20Petition%20to%20Oppose%20APA%20PTSD%20Guidelines>

*

Reply to group <mailto:nj6 at yahoogroups.com?subject=Re%3A%20Petition%20to%20Oppose%20APA%20PTSD%20Guidelines>

*

Start a New Topic<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/nj6/conversations/newtopic;_ylc=X3oDMTJmNGg0MnJvBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzkyNDUyMjEzBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA4MjY0MQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNudHBjBHN0aW1lAzE1MTg1MzQ5Nzc->

*

Messages in this topic<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/nj6/conversations/topics/721;_ylc=X3oDMTMzZ2JqdnVoBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzkyNDUyMjEzBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA4MjY0MQRtc2dJZAM3MjEEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbGsDdnRwYwRzdGltZQMxNTE4NTM0OTc3BHRwY0lkAzcyMQ--> (1)

________________________________
[Image removed by sender.]
Have you tried the highest rated email app?<https://yho.com/1wwmgg>
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.
________________________________
Visit Your Group<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/nj6/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbmhzMTYzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzkyNDUyMjEzBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA4MjY0MQRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE1MTg1MzQ5Nzc->
[Image removed by sender. Yahoo! Groups]<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlbWI0MmU0BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzkyNDUyMjEzBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA4MjY0MQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTUxODUzNDk3Nw-->
* Privacy<https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> * Unsubscribe<mailto:nj6-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> * Terms of Use<https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

.


__,_._,___

Madelyn Simring Milchman, Ph.D.
Upper Montclair, NJ
(973) 783-6235
madelyn at milchman.com<mailto:madelyn at milchman.com>

Click on this link to unsubscribe from this list UNSUBSCRIBE<mailto:DIV43-unsubscribe-request at lists.apa.org?subject=unsubscribe>

An email will automatically open with "Unsubscribe" in the subject area. Just Send the message, as is, to unsubscribe from this list..
********************* Division 17 information can be found at http://www.div17.org/ To leave the the LISTSERV please send mail to div17discuss-unsubscribe-request at lists.apa.org?subject=unsubscribe<mailto:div17discuss-unsubscribe-request at lists.apa.org?subject=unsubscribe> and do not include your signature Information on LISTSERVs may be found at http://www.div17.org/about_listserv.html ********************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists-prod.uoregon.edu/pipermail/cpsylist/attachments/20180214/abb89ef3/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the cpsylist mailing list